Incidence and medical complications of COVID-19 in the total laryngectomy population: A population-based study

Objectives Laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers treated with total laryngectomy (TL) may provide a unique avenue for COVID-19 to infect cancer patients. The objective of this investigation was to identify incidence of COVID-19 infection and potential complications in TL patients. Materials and Methods Data was extracted from TriNetX COVID-19 research network from from 2019-2021 and ICD-10 codes were utilized to query for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer, and outcomes of interest. Cohorts were propensity score-matched based on demographics and co-morbidities. Results A query of active patients in TriNetX from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 identified 36,414 patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer out of the 50,474,648 active patients in the database. The overall COVID-19 incidence in the non-laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer population was 10.8% compared to 18.8% (p<0.001) in the laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer group. Those who underwent TL had a statistically significant increased incidence of acquiring COVID-19 (24.0%) when compared to those without TL (17.7%) (p<0.001). TL patients with COVID-19 had a higher risk of developing pneumonia RR (risk ratio) 1.80 (1.43, 2.26), death 1.74 (1.41, 2.14), ARDS 2.42 (1.16, 5.05), sepsis 1.77 (1.37, 2.29), shock 2.81 (1.88, 4.18), respiratory failure 2.34 (1.90, 2.88), and malnutrition 2.46 (2.01, 3.01) when matched with those COVID-19 positive cancer patients without TL. Conclusions Laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer patients had a higher rate of acquiring COVID-19 than patients without these cancers. TL patients have a higher rate of COVID-19 compared to those without TL and may be at a higher risk for sequalae of COVID-19.

Incidence and medical complications of COVID-19 in the total laryngectomy population: A population-based study.

OBJECTIVES: Laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers treated with total laryngectomy (TL) may provide a unique avenue for COVID-19 to infect cancer patients. The objective of this investigation was to identify incidence of COVID-19 infection and potential complications in TL patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data was extracted from TriNetX COVID-19 research network from from 2019 to 2021 and ICD-10 codes were utilized to query for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer, and outcomes of interest. Cohorts were propensity score-matched based on demographics and co-morbidities. RESULTS: A query of active patients in TriNetX from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 identified 36,414 patients with laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer out of the 50,474,648 active patients in the database. The overall COVID-19 incidence in the non-laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer population was 10.8% compared to 18.8% (p < 0.001) in the laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer group. Those who underwent TL had a statistically significant increased incidence of acquiring COVID-19 (24.0%) when compared to those without TL (17.7%) (p < 0.001). TL patients with COVID-19 had a higher risk of developing pneumonia RR (risk ratio) 1.80 (1.43, 2.26), death 1.74 (1.41, 2.14), ARDS 2.42 (1.16, 5.05), sepsis 1.77 (1.37, 2.29), shock 2.81 (1.88, 4.18), respiratory failure 2.34 (1.90, 2.88), and malnutrition 2.46 (2.01, 3.01) when matched with those COVID-19 positive cancer patients without TL. CONCLUSIONS: Laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer patients had a higher rate of acquiring COVID-19 than patients without these cancers. TL patients have a higher rate of COVID-19 compared to those without TL and may be at a higher risk for sequalae of COVID-19.

COVID-19 and Bell's Palsy

Definition: There are various neurological manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Recent data suggest a connection between hemifacial paralysis, or Bell's palsy, and COVID-19. Although the etiology of Bell's palsy is unknown, the leading proposed etiology is viral in nature. Since the onset of the pandemic, numerous studies have investigated the relationship between Bell's palsy, COVID-19 infection, and COVID-19 vaccination. The researchers studied the current literature on the topic of COVID-19 as it relates to Bell's palsy. [ FROM AUTHOR]

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental Health of Older Primary Care Patients and Their Family Members.

The COVID-19 pandemic introduced mandatory stay-at-home orders and concerns about contracting a virus that impacted the physical and mental health of much of the world's population. This study compared the rates of depression and anxiety in a sample of older primary care patients (aged ≥65 years old) and their family members recruited for a clinical trial before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were dyads enrolled in the Caregiver Outcomes of Alzheimer's Disease Screening (COADS) trial, which included 1,809 dyads of older primary care patients and one of their family members. Mean scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) were measured and compared before and during the pandemic. We found no difference in depression and anxiety among dyads of older primary care patients and their family members recruited before and during COVID-19. Additionally, we found that older primary care patients and family members who reported their income as comfortable had significantly lower depression and anxiety compared to those who reported having not enough to make ends meet. Along with this, older primary care patients with a high school education or less were more likely to have anxiety compared to those with a postgraduate degree. Moreover, our findings support the notion that certain demographics of older primary care patients and family members are at a higher risk for depression and anxiety, indicating who should be targeted for psychological health interventions that can be adapted during COVID-19. Future research should continue monitoring older primary care patients and their family members through the remainder of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Treatment failure patterns are similar between p16- and p16+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas.

Background: The incidence of p16+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has been increasing. The notion that p16+ OPSCC has a propensity for atypical and disseminating metastasis has gained traction. We compared treatment failure patterns in p16+ and p16- OPSCC and evaluated survival impact. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with recurrent/metastatic OPSCC disease between 1/2009 and 12/2019. Results: Thirty-eight p16+ and 36 p16- patients were identified. Three distinct failure patterns (distant vs. locoregional, atypical vs. typical, and disseminating vs. non-disseminating) were studied. No significant differences were found between p16+ and p16- patients. Multivariate analysis showed p16 status was an independent prognostic biomarker; p16+ patients have a favorable overall survival compared to p16- patients (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.77; P = .005). Conclusions: We challenge the view that p16+ OPSCC exhibits a distinctive treatment failure pattern and showed that p16 status impacts patient survival independent of disease progression.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Older Adult Driving in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To examine how the COVID-19 pandemic affected driving and health outcomes in older adults. METHODS: We compared Advancing Understanding of Transportation Options (AUTO) study participants enrolled before (December 2019 to March 2020) versus during the pandemic (May 2020 to June 2021). Participants were English-speaking, licensed drivers (≥70 years) who drove weekly and had a primary care provider at a study site and ≥1 medical condition potentially associated with driving cessation. We used baseline self-reported measures on mobility and health. RESULTS: Compared to those enrolled pre-COVID-19 (n = 61), more participants enrolled during COVID-19 (n = 240) reported driving reductions (26% vs. 70%, p < .001) and more often for personal preference (vs. medical/emotional reasons). While mean social isolation was higher during than pre-COVID-19, self-reported depression, stress, and overall health PROMIS scores did not differ significantly. DISCUSSION: Our findings highlight the resiliency of some older adults and have implications for mitigating the negative effects of driving cessation.

The Relationship Between COVID 19 Anxiety and Dementia Caregivers Burden and Suffering

The impact of COVID-19 on dementia caregivers is gaining new interest. It is unknown how the pandemic has impacted caregivers’ burden and existential suffering. Analyses were performed on data for dementia caregivers (n=89) enrolled in the Indiana University Telephone Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Caregivers (TACTICs) pilot trials. Individuals were primary caregivers of a family member with dementia and had clinically significant anxiety measured by a GAD-7 score >10 or between 5-9 with reported interference in life. COVID-19 anxiety was measured using the NIH CoRonavIruS Health Impact Survey (CRISIS) questions. Caregivers were on average 55.2 years of age with 56.2% being child or child-in-law, 71.9% were white and 24.7% were Black. Mean burden scores, measured by the Zarit Burden Index, were higher (44.29) compared to means reported across the literature (26.7) indicating the sample experienced higher than normal levels of burden. Mean existential suffering scores measured by the subscale of Experience of Suffering Scale were lower (9.37) compared to means across the literature (11.5) indicating that overall participants experienced lower levels of existential suffering compared to those in previous studies. A significant relationship was found between COVID-19 anxiety and burden levels (x2= 9.07, p<0.05), with higher levels of COVID-19 anxiety associated with greater burden. A non-significant relationship was found between COVID-19 anxiety and existential suffering (x2=5.99, p=0.11). Results highlight the impact of COVID-19 anxiety as an external stressor on dementia caregiving. and the importance of considering context of external stressors when implementing intervention protocols for caregivers of individuals with dementia.